Comments on: Why Nofollow Didn’t Work – A Different Perspective http://w-shadow.com/blog/2008/01/07/why-nofollow-didnt-work-a-different-perspective/ Slightly Advanced Computer Stuff (and some magic) Sat, 21 Nov 2009 04:22:17 +0200 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: White Shadow http://w-shadow.com/blog/2008/01/07/why-nofollow-didnt-work-a-different-perspective/comment-page-1/#comment-11381 White Shadow Fri, 22 Feb 2008 20:21:08 +0000 http://w-shadow.com/blog/2008/01/07/why-nofollow-didnt-work-a-different-perspective/#comment-11381 Indeed. I hadn't thought of that aspect before, but now that you mention it, the similarity with email spam is remarkable. Indeed. I hadn’t thought of that aspect before, but now that you mention it, the similarity with email spam is remarkable.

]]> By: iDope http://w-shadow.com/blog/2008/01/07/why-nofollow-didnt-work-a-different-perspective/comment-page-1/#comment-11380 iDope Fri, 22 Feb 2008 19:10:06 +0000 http://w-shadow.com/blog/2008/01/07/why-nofollow-didnt-work-a-different-perspective/#comment-11380 IMO, this is why nofollow doesn't work. Why would spammers waste their time removing nofollow blogs from their lists when it takes less time to spam them? And even with nofollow they might get some click traffic. Comment spam is hardly different from its email cousin. Its a game of numbers. Both are profitable even with a low success rate. My $0.02 IMO, this is why nofollow doesn’t work. Why would spammers waste their time removing nofollow blogs from their lists when it takes less time to spam them? And even with nofollow they might get some click traffic. Comment spam is hardly different from its email cousin. Its a game of numbers. Both are profitable even with a low success rate.

My $0.02

]]>