<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Broken Link Checker Plugin Version 0.3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://w-shadow.com/blog/2008/02/18/broken-link-checker-plugin-version-03/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://w-shadow.com/blog/2008/02/18/broken-link-checker-plugin-version-03/</link>
	<description>A blog about web development, software business, and WordPress</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:10:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: White Shadow</title>
		<link>http://w-shadow.com/blog/2008/02/18/broken-link-checker-plugin-version-03/comment-page-3/#comment-26209</link>
		<dc:creator>White Shadow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 17:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://w-shadow.com/blog/2008/02/18/broken-link-checker-plugin-version-03/#comment-26209</guid>
		<description>A month seems too much for me, I wouldn&#039;t use anything higher than 2 weeks myself.

The plugin doesn&#039;t use that much bandwidth. It tries to use only HEAD requests (doesn&#039;t download the page, just checks it) when possible. However, it will double-check problematic links by attempting to download the entire page, which could expend a bit more bandwidth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A month seems too much for me, I wouldn&#8217;t use anything higher than 2 weeks myself.</p>
<p>The plugin doesn&#8217;t use that much bandwidth. It tries to use only HEAD requests (doesn&#8217;t download the page, just checks it) when possible. However, it will double-check problematic links by attempting to download the entire page, which could expend a bit more bandwidth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liverpool</title>
		<link>http://w-shadow.com/blog/2008/02/18/broken-link-checker-plugin-version-03/comment-page-3/#comment-25188</link>
		<dc:creator>Liverpool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 15:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://w-shadow.com/blog/2008/02/18/broken-link-checker-plugin-version-03/#comment-25188</guid>
		<description>Works well! great thanks, using in 2.7.1 ok.

It does find some broken links in post revisions which could confuse some.
(I have now disabled and removed all revisions!)

I have set to link check every 730 hours (1month), as our posts don&#039;t change that often. Is this wise? I just wanted to save bandwidth. Does this checker use much processing power &amp; bandwidth?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Works well! great thanks, using in 2.7.1 ok.</p>
<p>It does find some broken links in post revisions which could confuse some.<br />
(I have now disabled and removed all revisions!)</p>
<p>I have set to link check every 730 hours (1month), as our posts don&#8217;t change that often. Is this wise? I just wanted to save bandwidth. Does this checker use much processing power &amp; bandwidth?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Smith</title>
		<link>http://w-shadow.com/blog/2008/02/18/broken-link-checker-plugin-version-03/comment-page-3/#comment-13597</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 01:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://w-shadow.com/blog/2008/02/18/broken-link-checker-plugin-version-03/#comment-13597</guid>
		<description>Having just moved from one blogging platform to Wordpress, I had a ton of internal broken links. I would like to suggest that the broken link list just show internal links and links from specific domains. There&#039;s not much I can do about external links but I like the way they are crossed out.

Using it with 2.7 without issues so far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having just moved from one blogging platform to WordPress, I had a ton of internal broken links. I would like to suggest that the broken link list just show internal links and links from specific domains. There&#8217;s not much I can do about external links but I like the way they are crossed out.</p>
<p>Using it with 2.7 without issues so far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KadincaModa</title>
		<link>http://w-shadow.com/blog/2008/02/18/broken-link-checker-plugin-version-03/comment-page-3/#comment-12885</link>
		<dc:creator>KadincaModa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 03:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://w-shadow.com/blog/2008/02/18/broken-link-checker-plugin-version-03/#comment-12885</guid>
		<description>Wooow. Nice Plug. Very nice share</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wooow. Nice Plug. Very nice share</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: White Shadow</title>
		<link>http://w-shadow.com/blog/2008/02/18/broken-link-checker-plugin-version-03/comment-page-3/#comment-12349</link>
		<dc:creator>White Shadow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 13:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://w-shadow.com/blog/2008/02/18/broken-link-checker-plugin-version-03/#comment-12349</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&#039;#comment-12348&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@JC&lt;/a&gt; - Your idea was added to a very long list of suggested features. That is all. :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='#comment-12348' rel="nofollow">@JC</a> &#8211; Your idea was added to a very long list of suggested features. That is all. :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JC</title>
		<link>http://w-shadow.com/blog/2008/02/18/broken-link-checker-plugin-version-03/comment-page-3/#comment-12348</link>
		<dc:creator>JC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 12:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://w-shadow.com/blog/2008/02/18/broken-link-checker-plugin-version-03/#comment-12348</guid>
		<description>You know what would be great to add on to this would be to list the 301 redirects, and an ability to mass update them by any certain domain which changes their URL format. This would identify in most cases expired domains which become link farms and return as a 301, but certainly not something you want to still link to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know what would be great to add on to this would be to list the 301 redirects, and an ability to mass update them by any certain domain which changes their URL format. This would identify in most cases expired domains which become link farms and return as a 301, but certainly not something you want to still link to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bayan</title>
		<link>http://w-shadow.com/blog/2008/02/18/broken-link-checker-plugin-version-03/comment-page-3/#comment-11978</link>
		<dc:creator>bayan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 22:47:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://w-shadow.com/blog/2008/02/18/broken-link-checker-plugin-version-03/#comment-11978</guid>
		<description>thank good plugin broken link checker</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank good plugin broken link checker</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dade Williams</title>
		<link>http://w-shadow.com/blog/2008/02/18/broken-link-checker-plugin-version-03/comment-page-3/#comment-11752</link>
		<dc:creator>Dade Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 21:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://w-shadow.com/blog/2008/02/18/broken-link-checker-plugin-version-03/#comment-11752</guid>
		<description>ahh, well it appears it has worked</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ahh, well it appears it has worked</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: White Shadow</title>
		<link>http://w-shadow.com/blog/2008/02/18/broken-link-checker-plugin-version-03/comment-page-3/#comment-11751</link>
		<dc:creator>White Shadow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 21:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://w-shadow.com/blog/2008/02/18/broken-link-checker-plugin-version-03/#comment-11751</guid>
		<description>You know, when you hit the &quot;Delete&quot; link, it just sends a request to the server - it&#039;s not deleted instantly. So if you click it a lot of times and navigate away from the page some links might not get deleted ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, when you hit the &#8220;Delete&#8221; link, it just sends a request to the server &#8211; it&#8217;s not deleted instantly. So if you click it a lot of times and navigate away from the page some links might not get deleted ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dade Williams</title>
		<link>http://w-shadow.com/blog/2008/02/18/broken-link-checker-plugin-version-03/comment-page-3/#comment-11750</link>
		<dc:creator>Dade Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 20:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://w-shadow.com/blog/2008/02/18/broken-link-checker-plugin-version-03/#comment-11750</guid>
		<description>correction the dashboard does show the 517 broken links message but eitherway minor bug ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>correction the dashboard does show the 517 broken links message but eitherway minor bug ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

