<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WordPress Version Survey</title>
	<atom:link href="http://w-shadow.com/blog/2008/03/10/wordpress-version-survey/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://w-shadow.com/blog/2008/03/10/wordpress-version-survey/</link>
	<description>Slightly Advanced Computer Stuff (and some magic)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 04:22:17 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: White Shadow</title>
		<link>http://w-shadow.com/blog/2008/03/10/wordpress-version-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-11594</link>
		<dc:creator>White Shadow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 11:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://w-shadow.com/blog/2008/03/10/wordpress-version-survey/#comment-11594</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t seen any exploits targeted at that version specifically, but something like &lt;a href=&#039;http://milw0rm.com/exploits/4721&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; might still apply in certain cases.

Anyway, I&#039;m not a WP security expert ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t seen any exploits targeted at that version specifically, but something like <a href='http://milw0rm.com/exploits/4721' rel="nofollow">this</a> might still apply in certain cases.</p>
<p>Anyway, I&#8217;m not a WP security expert <img src='http://w-shadow.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ejm</title>
		<link>http://w-shadow.com/blog/2008/03/10/wordpress-version-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-11593</link>
		<dc:creator>ejm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 10:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://w-shadow.com/blog/2008/03/10/wordpress-version-survey/#comment-11593</guid>
		<description>Please correct me if I&#039;m wrong, but Wordpress 2.0.11 (the &quot;legacy&quot; version) is stable and is still considered to be safe to use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please correct me if I&#8217;m wrong, but Wordpress 2.0.11 (the &#8220;legacy&#8221; version) is stable and is still considered to be safe to use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
