<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Broken Link Checker 0.5 Available</title>
	<atom:link href="http://w-shadow.com/blog/2009/05/22/broken-link-checker-05/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://w-shadow.com/blog/2009/05/22/broken-link-checker-05/</link>
	<description>Slightly Advanced Computer Stuff (and some magic)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 03:52:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Newton</title>
		<link>http://w-shadow.com/blog/2009/05/22/broken-link-checker-05/comment-page-3/#comment-32670</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Newton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 18:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://w-shadow.com/?p=1114#comment-32670</guid>
		<description>Thanks again for a great plugin. I&#039;ve made a slight amendment, so that it adds &#039;rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&#039; to broken links as well as &#039;class=&quot;broken_link&quot;&#039;. This instructs search engines not to follow the broken link.

As for future improvements, I think you&#039;re right to put cron support top of the list, but comment links should be a close second.

Many blogs are conversations and comments can be as valuable as the original post. If you don&#039;t value comments enough to look after them, why have comments at all?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks again for a great plugin. I&#8217;ve made a slight amendment, so that it adds &#8216;rel=&#8221;nofollow&#8221;&#8216; to broken links as well as &#8216;class=&#8221;broken_link&#8221;&#8216;. This instructs search engines not to follow the broken link.</p>
<p>As for future improvements, I think you&#8217;re right to put cron support top of the list, but comment links should be a close second.</p>
<p>Many blogs are conversations and comments can be as valuable as the original post. If you don&#8217;t value comments enough to look after them, why have comments at all?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: White Shadow</title>
		<link>http://w-shadow.com/blog/2009/05/22/broken-link-checker-05/comment-page-3/#comment-32394</link>
		<dc:creator>White Shadow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 20:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://w-shadow.com/?p=1114#comment-32394</guid>
		<description>My first impulse is to say the site is doing it wrong - the 201 code is definitely &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; intended for reporting errors - and so there&#039;s nothing for me to fix. However, I have plans for eventually adding a new filter (or something similar) that would let you sort links by response code, so that might help once it&#039;s implemented.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My first impulse is to say the site is doing it wrong &#8211; the 201 code is definitely <em>not</em> intended for reporting errors &#8211; and so there&#8217;s nothing for me to fix. However, I have plans for eventually adding a new filter (or something similar) that would let you sort links by response code, so that might help once it&#8217;s implemented.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heidi</title>
		<link>http://w-shadow.com/blog/2009/05/22/broken-link-checker-05/comment-page-2/#comment-32389</link>
		<dc:creator>Heidi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 19:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://w-shadow.com/?p=1114#comment-32389</guid>
		<description>Hi there I love the idea of this plugin, however it is not detecting all my broken links. There is a site that I frequently link to that uses 201 error pages (I think...the broken links all end with 201) and it is imperative to the nature of my site that I am able to find these broken links and remove the posts when they are no longer valid links. Can you provide any help?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there I love the idea of this plugin, however it is not detecting all my broken links. There is a site that I frequently link to that uses 201 error pages (I think&#8230;the broken links all end with 201) and it is imperative to the nature of my site that I am able to find these broken links and remove the posts when they are no longer valid links. Can you provide any help?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BK</title>
		<link>http://w-shadow.com/blog/2009/05/22/broken-link-checker-05/comment-page-2/#comment-32290</link>
		<dc:creator>BK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 13:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://w-shadow.com/?p=1114#comment-32290</guid>
		<description>Thank you soooo much! I didn&#039;t really expect to get an answer, that&#039;s so kind of you! Have a great day!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you soooo much! I didn&#8217;t really expect to get an answer, that&#8217;s so kind of you! Have a great day!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: White Shadow</title>
		<link>http://w-shadow.com/blog/2009/05/22/broken-link-checker-05/comment-page-2/#comment-32285</link>
		<dc:creator>White Shadow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 11:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://w-shadow.com/?p=1114#comment-32285</guid>
		<description>You can view &amp; download old versions &lt;a href=&quot;http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/broken-link-checker/download/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. Any of the 0.4.x releases should be compatible with WP 2.6.1.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can view &#038; download old versions <a href="http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/broken-link-checker/download/" rel="nofollow">here</a>. Any of the 0.4.x releases should be compatible with WP 2.6.1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BK</title>
		<link>http://w-shadow.com/blog/2009/05/22/broken-link-checker-05/comment-page-2/#comment-32281</link>
		<dc:creator>BK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 05:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://w-shadow.com/?p=1114#comment-32281</guid>
		<description>Does anyone know of a version of this I can download that will work on my install of 2.6.1? I would love to use this, even if it&#039;s a slightly out of date version. I get &quot;network error&quot; when installing the newest one, so there must be an incompatability (as advertised).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone know of a version of this I can download that will work on my install of 2.6.1? I would love to use this, even if it&#8217;s a slightly out of date version. I get &#8220;network error&#8221; when installing the newest one, so there must be an incompatability (as advertised).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Broken Links und Broken Link Checker &#124; Blogging, Internet und Webpromotion</title>
		<link>http://w-shadow.com/blog/2009/05/22/broken-link-checker-05/comment-page-2/#comment-32131</link>
		<dc:creator>Broken Links und Broken Link Checker &#124; Blogging, Internet und Webpromotion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 05:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://w-shadow.com/?p=1114#comment-32131</guid>
		<description>[...] als auch externe Links gewesen. Auf dem rechten Screenshot seht ihr nochmals das Ergebnis der Broken-Links-&#220;berpr&#252;fung von [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] als auch externe Links gewesen. Auf dem rechten Screenshot seht ihr nochmals das Ergebnis der Broken-Links-&#220;berpr&#252;fung von [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ovidiu</title>
		<link>http://w-shadow.com/blog/2009/05/22/broken-link-checker-05/comment-page-2/#comment-31832</link>
		<dc:creator>ovidiu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:20:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://w-shadow.com/?p=1114#comment-31832</guid>
		<description>new version works flawless, might have been a glitch....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>new version works flawless, might have been a glitch&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: White Shadow</title>
		<link>http://w-shadow.com/blog/2009/05/22/broken-link-checker-05/comment-page-2/#comment-31800</link>
		<dc:creator>White Shadow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 17:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://w-shadow.com/?p=1114#comment-31800</guid>
		<description>@ ovidiu : Hmm, the plugin seems to be detecting redirects created by Redirection (arrgh) properly when I try it on my own site. Maybe the problem is with redirects in general, not just those created by that plugin? Do any other redirects show up in the plugin&#039;s &quot;Redirects&quot; list? 

Also, when the next version of the link checker is out (should be within 12 hours), go to the settings page and click on the small &quot;Show debug info&quot; link near the &quot;Status&quot; field. This will display a short report about your server configuration and WP installation; see if it mentions anything about redirects.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ ovidiu : Hmm, the plugin seems to be detecting redirects created by Redirection (arrgh) properly when I try it on my own site. Maybe the problem is with redirects in general, not just those created by that plugin? Do any other redirects show up in the plugin&#8217;s &#8220;Redirects&#8221; list? </p>
<p>Also, when the next version of the link checker is out (should be within 12 hours), go to the settings page and click on the small &#8220;Show debug info&#8221; link near the &#8220;Status&#8221; field. This will display a short report about your server configuration and WP installation; see if it mentions anything about redirects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: White Shadow</title>
		<link>http://w-shadow.com/blog/2009/05/22/broken-link-checker-05/comment-page-2/#comment-31793</link>
		<dc:creator>White Shadow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 09:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://w-shadow.com/?p=1114#comment-31793</guid>
		<description>@ Stuart : There probably is a bug in there somewhere, but are you sure it&#039;s that one? Snoopy is actually present in WP 2.8.4.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Stuart : There probably is a bug in there somewhere, but are you sure it&#8217;s that one? Snoopy is actually present in WP 2.8.4.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
