<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 10 Plugin Developers Of 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://w-shadow.com/blog/2009/12/28/top-10-plugin-developers-of-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://w-shadow.com/blog/2009/12/28/top-10-plugin-developers-of-2009/</link>
	<description>A blog about web development, software business, and WordPress</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 04:00:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: WordPress Picks for the Week [01/03] &#124; Techtites</title>
		<link>http://w-shadow.com/blog/2009/12/28/top-10-plugin-developers-of-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-33441</link>
		<dc:creator>WordPress Picks for the Week [01/03] &#124; Techtites</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 10:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://w-shadow.com/?p=1558#comment-33441</guid>
		<description>[...] Top 10 Plugin Developers Of 2009 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Top 10 Plugin Developers Of 2009 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://w-shadow.com/blog/2009/12/28/top-10-plugin-developers-of-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-33330</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 15:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://w-shadow.com/?p=1558#comment-33330</guid>
		<description>congrats on 24th - by no means a small feat :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>congrats on 24th &#8211; by no means a small feat :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lester Chan</title>
		<link>http://w-shadow.com/blog/2009/12/28/top-10-plugin-developers-of-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-33198</link>
		<dc:creator>Lester Chan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 19:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://w-shadow.com/?p=1558#comment-33198</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the mention =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the mention =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: White Shadow</title>
		<link>http://w-shadow.com/blog/2009/12/28/top-10-plugin-developers-of-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-33175</link>
		<dc:creator>White Shadow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 11:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://w-shadow.com/?p=1558#comment-33175</guid>
		<description>I used the (mostly undocumented) plugin directory API to obtain information about all plugins hosted on wordpress.org. Then I did some pre-processing and dumped the plugin info into a MySQL database. Finally, I ran a bunch of aggregate queries to construct the Top 10 list. I can send you the source code if you&#039;re interested.

The number of downloads is a combination of all their plugins. So, while my DB currently shows only 90 964 downloads for WP Contact Form (it&#039;s lower than the wp.org figure because my script caches the results for 24 hours), it does add up to 106 387 when you also consider &lt;a href=&quot;http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/profile/westi&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the other seven plugins&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used the (mostly undocumented) plugin directory API to obtain information about all plugins hosted on wordpress.org. Then I did some pre-processing and dumped the plugin info into a MySQL database. Finally, I ran a bunch of aggregate queries to construct the Top 10 list. I can send you the source code if you&#8217;re interested.</p>
<p>The number of downloads is a combination of all their plugins. So, while my DB currently shows only 90 964 downloads for WP Contact Form (it&#8217;s lower than the wp.org figure because my script caches the results for 24 hours), it does add up to 106 387 when you also consider <a href="http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/profile/westi" rel="nofollow">the other seven plugins</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Westwood</title>
		<link>http://w-shadow.com/blog/2009/12/28/top-10-plugin-developers-of-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-33172</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Westwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 08:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://w-shadow.com/?p=1558#comment-33172</guid>
		<description>What method do you use to build this list?

Are we looking at the top 1000 downloaded plugins and there authors or is it a combination of all their plugins?

I am curious as the downloads of one of my plugins is in the 7000 region and you numbers for downloads don&#039;t match the current numbers for other plugins too - for example you have 106 387 for http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/wp-contact-form/stats/ which only has 91000 at the moment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What method do you use to build this list?</p>
<p>Are we looking at the top 1000 downloaded plugins and there authors or is it a combination of all their plugins?</p>
<p>I am curious as the downloads of one of my plugins is in the 7000 region and you numbers for downloads don&#8217;t match the current numbers for other plugins too &#8211; for example you have 106 387 for <a href="http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/wp-contact-form/stats/" rel="nofollow">http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/wp-contact-form/stats/</a> which only has 91000 at the moment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: White Shadow</title>
		<link>http://w-shadow.com/blog/2009/12/28/top-10-plugin-developers-of-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-33166</link>
		<dc:creator>White Shadow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 21:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://w-shadow.com/?p=1558#comment-33166</guid>
		<description>@ Artem : It really is impressive. Last year, only one author on the Top 10 list was anywhere near 1 000 000 downloads. This year, &lt;em&gt;all but one&lt;/em&gt; have more than a million downloads.

@ Oliver : Not bad indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Artem : It really is impressive. Last year, only one author on the Top 10 list was anywhere near 1 000 000 downloads. This year, <em>all but one</em> have more than a million downloads.</p>
<p>@ Oliver : Not bad indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver Schlöbe</title>
		<link>http://w-shadow.com/blog/2009/12/28/top-10-plugin-developers-of-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-33165</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Schlöbe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 21:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://w-shadow.com/?p=1558#comment-33165</guid>
		<description>Yay, I&#039;m on #60. Not too bad on a list of 1000. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yay, I&#8217;m on #60. Not too bad on a list of 1000. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Artem Russakovskii</title>
		<link>http://w-shadow.com/blog/2009/12/28/top-10-plugin-developers-of-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-33164</link>
		<dc:creator>Artem Russakovskii</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 21:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://w-shadow.com/?p=1558#comment-33164</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s stunning to note how, compared to the 2008 list you posted (http://w-shadow.com/blog/2008/12/28/top-10-wordpress-plugin-developers/), the numbers of downloads essentially quadrupled on average.

Stunning growth of WP, and rightfully so!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s stunning to note how, compared to the 2008 list you posted (<a href="http://w-shadow.com/blog/2008/12/28/top-10-wordpress-plugin-developers/" rel="nofollow">http://w-shadow.com/blog/2008/12/28/top-10-wordpress-plugin-developers/</a>), the numbers of downloads essentially quadrupled on average.</p>
<p>Stunning growth of WP, and rightfully so!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

