<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Broken Link Checker Survey Results</title>
	<atom:link href="http://w-shadow.com/blog/2010/02/02/broken-link-checker-survey-results/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://w-shadow.com/blog/2010/02/02/broken-link-checker-survey-results/</link>
	<description>A blog about web development, software business, and WordPress</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:10:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: WordPress Plugin: Broken Link Checker - Wendy Cholbi</title>
		<link>http://w-shadow.com/blog/2010/02/02/broken-link-checker-survey-results/comment-page-1/#comment-183312</link>
		<dc:creator>WordPress Plugin: Broken Link Checker - Wendy Cholbi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 06:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://w-shadow.com/?p=1632#comment-183312</guid>
		<description>[...] Broken Link Checker page, and a description of an upcoming version (0.9), and the author&#8217;s discussion of a user survey, including descriptions of some planned features. Feel free to share! Bookmark on Delicious [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Broken Link Checker page, and a description of an upcoming version (0.9), and the author&#8217;s discussion of a user survey, including descriptions of some planned features. Feel free to share! Bookmark on Delicious [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ø The Viralogy Offer &#124; W-Shadow.com ø</title>
		<link>http://w-shadow.com/blog/2010/02/02/broken-link-checker-survey-results/comment-page-1/#comment-33548</link>
		<dc:creator>ø The Viralogy Offer &#124; W-Shadow.com ø</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 16:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://w-shadow.com/?p=1632#comment-33548</guid>
		<description>[...]     In this post I will explain what the &#8220;Viralogy.com script&#8221; thing mentioned in the Broken Link Checker survey was all about, discuss the user response and attempt to verbalize my rather unclear thoughts on the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]     In this post I will explain what the &#8220;Viralogy.com script&#8221; thing mentioned in the Broken Link Checker survey was all about, discuss the user response and attempt to verbalize my rather unclear thoughts on the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: White Shadow</title>
		<link>http://w-shadow.com/blog/2010/02/02/broken-link-checker-survey-results/comment-page-1/#comment-33516</link>
		<dc:creator>White Shadow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 14:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://w-shadow.com/?p=1632#comment-33516</guid>
		<description>This topic probably warrants a separate post, but here&#039;s the short version:

16% of users are okay with it, 39% don&#039;t like the idea and 35% don&#039;t care. The remaining 10% either asked for more information about the script or said they&#039;d be okay with it being included if enabling it was optional. On the yes/no question, 39% said they would enable the script if it was included.

Personally, I&#039;m simply not convinced the offer would be profitable enough to risk the users&#039; goodwill for. I mean, the only non-evil way to bundle the script is make its installation optional, and I can bet most users wouldn&#039;t install it.

Nevertheless, I haven&#039;t made the final decision yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This topic probably warrants a separate post, but here&#8217;s the short version:</p>
<p>16% of users are okay with it, 39% don&#8217;t like the idea and 35% don&#8217;t care. The remaining 10% either asked for more information about the script or said they&#8217;d be okay with it being included if enabling it was optional. On the yes/no question, 39% said they would enable the script if it was included.</p>
<p>Personally, I&#8217;m simply not convinced the offer would be profitable enough to risk the users&#8217; goodwill for. I mean, the only non-evil way to bundle the script is make its installation optional, and I can bet most users wouldn&#8217;t install it.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, I haven&#8217;t made the final decision yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ozh</title>
		<link>http://w-shadow.com/blog/2010/02/02/broken-link-checker-survey-results/comment-page-1/#comment-33515</link>
		<dc:creator>Ozh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 13:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://w-shadow.com/?p=1632#comment-33515</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m curious about the viralogy stuff, what users said and what are your thoughts about it. I&#039;ve been approached by them too, but turned them down as I didn&#039;t see any benefit in bundling their stuff (benefit for users, that is)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m curious about the viralogy stuff, what users said and what are your thoughts about it. I&#8217;ve been approached by them too, but turned them down as I didn&#8217;t see any benefit in bundling their stuff (benefit for users, that is)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey</title>
		<link>http://w-shadow.com/blog/2010/02/02/broken-link-checker-survey-results/comment-page-1/#comment-33508</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 22:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://w-shadow.com/?p=1632#comment-33508</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the nice summary.
There were mentioned some good things :)
It&#039;s a must have Plugin for me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the nice summary.<br />
There were mentioned some good things :)<br />
It&#8217;s a must have Plugin for me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

