<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Viralogy Offer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://w-shadow.com/blog/2010/02/04/the-viralogy-offer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://w-shadow.com/blog/2010/02/04/the-viralogy-offer/</link>
	<description>A blog about web development, software business, and WordPress</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 04:00:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://w-shadow.com/blog/2010/02/04/the-viralogy-offer/comment-page-1/#comment-124603</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 06:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://w-shadow.com/?p=1651#comment-124603</guid>
		<description>If the script is optional, what would the user have to complain about?  As long as it&#039;s clearly explained, it&#039;s just an extra optional feature.  

Including it either without the user knowing or without the option, now that could gain poor publicity.  If that were the case, I&#039;d agree with Ozh &amp; Artem - but it&#039;s not.  If you had the ability to terminate the agreement in the future, it would be worth trying and see what happens.

Good luck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the script is optional, what would the user have to complain about?  As long as it&#8217;s clearly explained, it&#8217;s just an extra optional feature.  </p>
<p>Including it either without the user knowing or without the option, now that could gain poor publicity.  If that were the case, I&#8217;d agree with Ozh &amp; Artem &#8211; but it&#8217;s not.  If you had the ability to terminate the agreement in the future, it would be worth trying and see what happens.</p>
<p>Good luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ozh</title>
		<link>http://w-shadow.com/blog/2010/02/04/the-viralogy-offer/comment-page-1/#comment-33556</link>
		<dc:creator>Ozh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 07:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://w-shadow.com/?p=1651#comment-33556</guid>
		<description>Had the same conclusion upon their offer: not worth anything to users and even might unplease them, and worth nothing to me. Conclusion: no.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Had the same conclusion upon their offer: not worth anything to users and even might unplease them, and worth nothing to me. Conclusion: no.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Artem Russakovskii</title>
		<link>http://w-shadow.com/blog/2010/02/04/the-viralogy-offer/comment-page-1/#comment-33553</link>
		<dc:creator>Artem Russakovskii</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 01:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://w-shadow.com/?p=1651#comment-33553</guid>
		<description>This reminds me of the Beacon and the Facebook scandal which was generally received very negatively.

Combined with the latest concerns about privacy that Bruce Schneier wrote about at  http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2010/01/tracking_your_b.html and http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2010/02/anonymity_and_t_3.html, I&#039;d say you shouldn&#039;t go for it, especially without clear upsides.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This reminds me of the Beacon and the Facebook scandal which was generally received very negatively.</p>
<p>Combined with the latest concerns about privacy that Bruce Schneier wrote about at  <a href="http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2010/01/tracking_your_b.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2010/01/tracking_your_b.html</a> and <a href="http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2010/02/anonymity_and_t_3.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2010/02/anonymity_and_t_3.html</a>, I&#8217;d say you shouldn&#8217;t go for it, especially without clear upsides.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

